<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2009/01/09/happy-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2009/01/09/happy-2009/</link>
	<description>Travels in a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2009/01/09/happy-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-54858</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/?p=297#comment-54858</guid>
		<description>Hi ChrisW,

Thanks for pointing out that discussion- I had seen the original post but not the follow-on comments. I wish I totally understood OSS licensing (even having just been to a seminar on it)! My personal view is that it&#039;s up to the mapfish guys to sort it out for their demo, and then for everyone else to sort it out for their own particular circumstances (eg if they have the commercial licenses etc). Not that I&#039;m trying to back away from the issue at all :-)

Jo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ChrisW,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out that discussion- I had seen the original post but not the follow-on comments. I wish I totally understood OSS licensing (even having just been to a seminar on it)! My personal view is that it&#8217;s up to the mapfish guys to sort it out for their demo, and then for everyone else to sort it out for their own particular circumstances (eg if they have the commercial licenses etc). Not that I&#8217;m trying to back away from the issue at all <img src='http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisW</title>
		<link>http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/2009/01/09/happy-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-54085</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archaeogeek.com/blog/?p=297#comment-54085</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the discussion on James Fee&#039;s blog (http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/01/08/mapfish-and-google-earth-api/) about the alleged licencing implications of using MapFish (GPL3), which includes Ext (GPL3), alongside Google in a web app?  Some people say there&#039;s a risk of GPL contamination, others say it&#039;s an &quot;aggregate&quot; which is permitted by the GPL.  You pay your (lawyers) money, and you take your choice, I guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the discussion on James Fee&#8217;s blog (<a href="http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/01/08/mapfish-and-google-earth-api/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2009/01/08/mapfish-and-google-earth-api/</a>) about the alleged licencing implications of using MapFish (GPL3), which includes Ext (GPL3), alongside Google in a web app?  Some people say there&#8217;s a risk of GPL contamination, others say it&#8217;s an &#8220;aggregate&#8221; which is permitted by the GPL.  You pay your (lawyers) money, and you take your choice, I guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

